Laughlin v. Street Railway Co.

This case has before been in this Court, and is reported in 62 Mich. 220. It is unnecessary to restate the case or the facts here, as they are the same in both records, or to discuss the general principles involved. They are discussed and decided in the former opinion of the Court.

Counsel for plaintiff was permitted by the court to read to the jury the decision of this Court in the same case, upon the subject of contributory negligence. He accompanied his reading with the following statement:

“Here is the opinion of the Supreme Court upon a question of fact, whether this party was guilty of…