Legal Opinion
Joe Hand Promotions v. Burg's Lounge
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 4, 1997No. Civil Action 96-6142PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOYNER, District Judge.
This is an action for statutory damages pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 605 for the unlawful exhibition for commercial advantage of the closed circuit television signal of the August 19, 1995 Tyson-McNeely boxing event (the “Event”). Plaintiff Joe Hand Promotions (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against thirty-seven defendants (various taverns and their respective owners) on September 9, 1996. On November 25, 1996, Plaintiff moved for the entry of default and default judgment against seven defendants for failure to appear, answer or otherwise defend the Complaint.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- International Cablevision, Inc. D/B/A Adelphia Cable v. John Sykes and Marvin NoelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- United States v. William C. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Cablevision System Corp. v. 45 Midland Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
3Cited by7 opinions
- Time Warner Cable of New York City v. Googies Luncheonette, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Rennard Street Enterprises, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- TWC Cable Partners v. Cableworks, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Joe Hand Promotions v. Burg's LoungeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Gelb Sports v. Auer, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.