Legal Opinion · Dissent

International Milling Co. v. Columbia Transportation Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 1, 1933No. 29,466Published

1DissentLoring, Justice

A foreign corporation is not immune from the orderly processes of state courts although its business is wholly interstate in char acter. The requirements of justice are paramount, unless submission thereto in the state where jurisdiction is sought imposes an unreasonable obstruction or undue burden upon interstate commerce. Davis v. Farmers Co-op. Equity Co. 262 U. S. 312, 43 S. Ct. 556, 67 L. ed. 996.

The sole question here presented appears to be whether or not the suit begun by levy upon defendant’s ship upon a cause of action arising in another state is an unreasonable burden upon…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Davis v. Farmers Co-Operative Equity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Michigan Central Railroad v. MixSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad v. TerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API