Legal Opinion

Lumm v. CC Servs., Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 31, 2018No. A161742PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDehoog, P.J.

*41Defendants, a corporation and its employees, appeal from the trial court's order denying their motion to compel arbitration of plaintiff's claims and stay judicial proceedings. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that the court erred, reverse, and remand for the trial court to consider defendants' motion under the proper framework.

Plaintiff worked for defendants as an insurance sales agent. The parties dispute whether plaintiff was an employee or an independent contractor, but, as we explain below, that question is immaterial to the present appeal. After defendants terminated their…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cornelio v. Premere Rehab, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  2. Durany v. Majorie House McMinnville, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  3. Durany v. Majorie House McMinnville, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  4. Godon v. Bend-CDJR, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
  5. Cornelio v. Premere Rehab, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API