Legal Opinion
Huntington Bank v. Freeman
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 24, 1989No. 89-P-2051PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMahoney, J.
The defendant-appellant, Georgia M. Freeman, entered into a loan agreement for $3,818.22 with the plaintiff-appellee, Huntington Bank (“bank”), in order to purchase a 1981 Pontiac Grand LeMans automobile. The appellant signed a promissory note which was secured or “col-lateralized” by the automobile.
The appellant ceased making payments on the loan, and on January 22, 1988 the bank repossessed the car and later sold the car at a public auction. On March 11, 1988, the bank sued the appellant for $2,221.37, the deficiency on the promissory note.
The matter was tried to the court on October…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blon v. Bank One, Akron, N.A.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Liberty National Bank v. GreinerOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
- Columbus Motor Car Co. v. Textile-Tech, Inc.Franklin County Municipal Court · 1981
- First National Bank of New Bremen v. TurnerOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
- Huntington National Bank v. ElkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Greathouse v. Charter National Bank-SouthwestTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- daimler/chrysler Truck Financial v. Kimball, 2007-Ca-07 (12-14-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Vannoy v. Capital Lincoln-Mercury Sales, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Glouster Community Bank v. WinchellOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Hanlin v. Ohio Builders and Remodelers, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.