Luis Felipe Cervantes-Gonzales v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed November 14, 2000, is amended to delete the last paragraph starting on page 14493 and carrying over to page 14494 (Likewise, “the extreme hardship” clause ....) of the slip opinion and replacing it with the following two paragraphs:
Like the discretionary relief at issue in Samaniego-Meraz, § 212(i) provides immigration judges with discretion to waive a bar to admissibility. “In general, denying eligibility for discretionary relief from deportation ... does not constitute an impermissible retroactive application of a statute.” Magano^-Pizano v. INS, 200 F.3d 603, 612…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Daniel Magana-Pizano v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Jose Guadalupe Larita-Martinez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Alfonso Aragon-Ayon v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Juan Tafolla Ramirez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Ansberto Gonzalez v. Kenneth Cuccinelli, IICourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- Pierrot Bejjani v. Immigration and Naturalization Service John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Jagubhai Naranbhai Patel, Vanitaben Thakorbhai Patel v. Alberto Gonzales, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Agwu Okpa, A/K/A Okpa Agwu Okpa v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- Xiao Min Chen v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.