Legal Opinion

Vail v. City of Bandon

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 13, 1981No. 80-801, 80-802, CA 19218PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

These are consolidated suits by owners of unimproved real property who seek to enjoin the defendant city from enforcing ordinances which impose higher sewer district assessments on unimproved property than on improved property. The trial court granted the city’s motions for summary judgment, and plaintiffs appeal. We affirm.

The city’s Ordinance No. 842, section 11(4), was adopted through an initiative measure and took effect on February 27, 1979. As originally enacted, it provided in relevant part:

"* * * [I]n all instances in which an improvement district contains at least forty (40%) per…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Olsen v. State Ex Rel. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Western Amusement Co., Inc. v. City of SpringfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Stanley v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Wing v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morsman v. City of MadrasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. Dames v. City Council for City of Forest GroveCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. Jah-I-Dah Gumbs v. Schneider Regional Medical Center, Maria C. Juelle, P.A.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API