Legal Opinion

Tinsley v. Monson & Sons Cattle Co.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 13, 1970No. 109-40767-2PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPetrie, J.

Plaintiff instituted this action alleging defendant’s operation of a cattle feedlot adjacent to plaintiff’s property constitutes a nuisance, seeking abatement thereof and damages allegedly sustained by reason of loss of his comfortable enjoyment of life and property and by reason of loss in reasonable market value of his property. Defendant denied maintenance of a nuisance and by way of affirmative defense alleged establishment of a legitimate business prior to plaintiff’s purchase of property adjacent to the feedlot and further alleged that any inconvenience experienced by plaintiff is a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morin v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Sanwick v. Puget Sound Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Riblet v. Spokane-Portland Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Lewis v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Dill v. Excel Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bunyak v. Clyde J. Yancey & Sons Dairy, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. Botsch v. Leigh Land Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. LeRoyWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  5. Botsch v. Leigh Land Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API