State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Drobot
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND DISCUSSING DISQUALIFICATION
Andrew J. Guilford, United States District Judge
This matter concerns whether a lawyer can represent—at the same time, in the same litigation, in the same courthouse—a criminal and his victim.
Being a defendant—particularly a criminal one—can be lonely. As a society, we don’t require a defendant’s friends to stand by the defendant. We don’t require a defendant’s parents to stand by the defendant. We don’t require a defendant’s children to stand by the defendant. We don’t even require a defendant’s spouse to stand by the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- 389 Orange Street Partners v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- People Ex Rel. Deparment of Corporations. v. Speedee Oil Change Systems, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Flatt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP v. J-M Mfg. Co.California Supreme Court · 2018
- Jeffrey I Golden v. O'Melveny & Myers, LLPDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019
- Spikes v. AraboDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Turner v. Hunt Hill Apartments, LLCNorth Carolina Business Court · 2020