Legal Opinion

Horn v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 10, 1960No. 41,963PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Price, J.:

This was an action to recover for personal injuries and property damage resulting from a collision of plaintiff’s automobile and defendant railroad’s passenger train. The engineer of the train also was joined as a defendant but for convenience they will be referred to in the singular.

Plaintiff appeals from an order sustaining a demurrer to his evidence.

The action was based — not on negligence — but solely on wantonness. During a discussion between court and counsel concerning the admissibility of certain evidence, counsel for plaintiff stated:

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Frazier v. Cities Service Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  2. Long Ex Rel. Long v. FoleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  3. Bailey v. ResnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  4. City of Topeka v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  5. Bledsoe ex rel. Bledsoe v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Folks v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  2. Crutsinger v. HessDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1976
  3. Schaeffer v. Kansas Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  4. Cope v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  5. Horton v. Montgomery WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API