Eodice v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Per curiam
After finding appellant guilty of use of a criminal instrument, the district court assessed punishment at imprisonment for four years and a $500 fine, suspended imposition of sentence, and placed appellant on probation. Tex.Pen.Code Ann. § 16.01 (Supp.1987). 1 The only issue on appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction.
Shortly after 2:00 a.m. on August 3, 1986, Killeen police officer Michael Brown observed appellant standing in the doorway of a pawn shop not then open for business. When Brown approached appellant, he saw that appellant was carrying a pair of heavy…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Universal Amusement Co., Inc. v. VanceDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1975
- Fronatt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Carrasco v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1986
- Simmons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
3Cited by14 opinions
- Nobby Lobby, Inc. v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Ariel Medina v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Nobby Lobby, Inc. v. City of DallasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1991
- Janjua v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.