Legal Opinion

Eodice v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 23, 1987No. 3-87-059-CRPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

After finding appellant guilty of use of a criminal instrument, the district court assessed punishment at imprisonment for four years and a $500 fine, suspended imposition of sentence, and placed appellant on probation. Tex.Pen.Code Ann. § 16.01 (Supp.1987). 1 The only issue on appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction.

Shortly after 2:00 a.m. on August 3, 1986, Killeen police officer Michael Brown observed appellant standing in the doorway of a pawn shop not then open for business. When Brown approached appellant, he saw that appellant was carrying a pair of heavy…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Universal Amusement Co., Inc. v. VanceDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1975
  2. Fronatt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  3. Carrasco v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1986
  4. Simmons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Nobby Lobby, Inc. v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  2. Ariel Medina v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
  3. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  4. Nobby Lobby, Inc. v. City of DallasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1991
  5. Janjua v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API