Legal Opinion
Quebe v. Ford Motor Co.
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided December 11, 1995No. 1:95-cv-00308PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WALTER S. SMITH, Jr., District Judge.
Came on to be considered Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand and the responses thereto. After careful consideration, the Court is of the opinion that Plaintiffs’ motion is meritorious and is therefore granted.
I. Background
The Plaintiffs Karl Quebe (“Quebe”) and Warren Ricks (“Ricks”) filed the instant action, on behalf of themselves and others, in the 74th Judicial District Court of McLennan County, Texas, against the following Defendants: Ford Motor Company, Inc. (“Ford”), Mazda Motor of America, Inc. (“Mazda”), Fred Capdevielle, (“Capdevielle”), Texas Ford…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Rose M. Clark v. National Travelers Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Snyder v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Zahn v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Barbara Allen v. R & H Oil & Gas Company, Farrar Oilfield Service and Equipment Co., and Tri-State Oil Services, Inc., Tri-State Oil Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Getty Oil Corporation, Succeeded by and a Division of Texaco, Inc. v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Michael Spielman v. Genzyme Corp. And Genzyme Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Coghlan v. Wellcraft Marine Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Sanderson, Thompson, Ratledge & Zimny v. AWACS, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1997
- Tortola Restaurants, L.P. v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1997
- Peterson v. BASF Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.