Legal Opinion

Burney v. INTERMARE KG, KUHLSCHIFF KMBH AND CO.

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided September 16, 1988No. 85-1869-Civ-T-10Published

1Opinion of the Court

717 F.Supp. 793 (1988)

Bobby C. BURNEY, Plaintiff,

v.

INTERMARE K.G., K.S. KUHLSCHIFF K.m.b.H. AND COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Defendant.

No. 85-1869-Civ-T-10.

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division.

July 12, 1988.

On Motion to Amend September 16, 1988.

Roger Vaughan, Wagner Cunningham Vaughan McLaughlin, Tampa, Fla., for plaintiff.

Allen von Spiegelfeld, Fowler, White, Gillen, Boggs, Villareal & Banker, P.A., Tampa, Fla., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM DECISION

GAGLIARDI, Senior District Judge.

In this diversity case defendant Intermare K.G., K.S. Kuhlschiff, K.m.b.H. and Co.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Scindia Steam Navigation Co. v. De Los SantosSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Bould v. TouchetteSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  3. Lassitter v. Intern. Union of Op. Engin.Supreme Court of Florida · 1977
  4. James Turner, and Cross-Appellee v. Japan Lines, Ltd., and Philippine President Lines Inc., Manila, and Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. Goldstein v. Manhattan Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API