Legal Opinion

State v. Shoemake

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 13, 1981No. 78-10-448, CA 17387PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.

Defendant was charged with the crime of burglary in the first degree. ORS 164.225. He moved for an order declaring a mistrial because the state, before resting, recalled a witness, Mrs. Milbum, to the stand, and she testified to something which the defendant asserts she "remembered” only because she was "coached” by the prosecutor. The trial court granted the motion for a mistrial. The trial court later reversed itself, declaring that there was no prosecutorial misconduct, and allowed the defendant to be tried again on the same charge. Defendant’s motion to dismiss the charge on grounds of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. State v. RathbunOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API