Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 22, 1980No. C79-09-33235, CA 16610PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

The issue in this case and in the companion case of State v. Brown, 48 Or App 223, 616 P2d 582 (1980) is whether jeopardy has attached and prohibits a retrial when, in defendant’s first trial, due to the bailiff’s inadvertent error, the jury saw the defendant in handcuffs and the trial court granted the defendant’s subsequent motion for mistrial. The trial court in the present case held that jeopardy had attached and dismissed. We reverse. We hold that the bailiff’s negligent mistake in this case is not judicial misconduct which precludes a retrial of the defendant. State v. Rathbun, 287 Or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. State v. RathbunOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Reinhart v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HopsonWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Smith v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. State v. ShoemakeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. State v. HopsonWashington Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API