Legal Opinion
In Re Western District Xerox Litigation
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided April 26, 1994No. 1:91-cr-00138PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, District Judge.
Between June 1989 to April 1990, twenty-three former employees 1 of Xerox Corporation (“Xerox”) filed twenty-three separate actions, in the Western District of New York, alleging that they were each terminated or forced to retire from Xerox during 1981-82, on account of their age, in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq.
The alleged discriminatory acts occurred during 1981-82 when Xerox reduced its work force by 18,000 employees.
All of the plaintiffs, in their separate complaints, have alleged that…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Hipp v. Liberty National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Amaya v. Ballyshear LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- United States v. East River Housing Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Schwed v. General Electric Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1995
- Wado v. Xerox Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.