Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rovello v. Orofino Realty Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 1976Published

1DissentWachtler, J.

The majority of this court has today ruled that on a motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 7), the trial court may not dismiss as long as the complaint and the plaintiffs affidavit, if there be any, state all the elements of a cause of action, and that a defendant’s affidavit, clearly showing the absence of one of these essential elements, is of no avail. In essence, the majority has abrogated the statute and has revitalized the common-law demurrer.

In October, 1970, the individual defendant entered into a *637written agreement with the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nader v. General Motors Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Rapoport v. SchneiderNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Kelly v. Bank of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  4. Harris v. SobelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  5. Hamilton Printing Co. v. Ernest Payne Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API