Legal Opinion

Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad v. City of Richmond

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 17, 1926PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurks, J.

When this case was decided by the trial court, the learned judge of that court delivered a written opinion, in which he made the following statement of facts:

*232“This is an action by the plaintiff Railroad Company against the city of Richmond, in which it claims the right to recover from the city one-half of the total cost of bridge building and construction work done in connection with the street crossings of its James River Division line!, locally known as the belt line. The total amount, one-half of which it is claimed that the city should pay, results from the depression of the tracks of the…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Hunter v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Manigault v. SpringsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. City of GoldsboroSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. New Orleans Gas Light Co. v. Drainage Commission of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ford v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  2. Kirkpatrick v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  3. County of York v. Peninsula Airport CommissionSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  4. Short Pump Town Center Community Development Authority v. HahnSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
  5. Holmberg v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1927

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API