Legal Opinion

Holmberg v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1927No. 24917PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.

August E. Holmberg, hereinafter deferred to as plaintiff, owns and resides upon a quarter-section farm situated near Wausa, Nebraska. This farm is bisected by the right of way of the Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Company, hereinafter referred to as defendant. Situated north of defendant’s right of way is a depression or low, wet valley which in a general way parallels the right *729of way and is useful for pasturage only. It contains some eighteen acres of land and extends across the farm. A branch of this valley extends to the southward intersecting the defendant’s line of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Illinois ex rel. Drainage CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Manigault v. SpringsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Union Dry Goods Co. v. Georgia Public Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Brooks-Scanlon Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of La.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Canada v. Peake, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State Ex Rel. American Telechronometer Co. v. BakerWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Neylon v. Petersen & Petersen, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Kloewer v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  5. First National Bank v. Southroads BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API