Legal Opinion

Bowen v. . Fox

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1887PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Civil ACTION, tried at May Term, 1887, of VaNCE Superior Court, before Merrimon, Judge, to recover damages for the seduction of plaintiff’s daughter, by the defendant’s testator. Defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

(MR. JUSTICE DAVIS dissenting.) This action, begun in February, 1886, is to recover damages for the seduction and debauchment of the plaintiff's daughter by the defendant William Fox, on whom service of process was made, and who dying before the trial, his, executrix, Emma Fox, was brought in by summons to defend in his stead. The averments in the complaint are explicitly denied in the answer of the original defendant, and both pleadings are supported by oath.

The cause was tried, and upon the findings of the damages upon the only issue submitted to the jury, judgment was rendered for the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Allison v. . WhittierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  2. Bowen v. . FoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  3. Bowen v. . FoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  4. Harmon v. . HerndonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API