Legal Opinion

Williams v. Brooks

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 7, 2006No. Civil Action 04-5619PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.

Petitioner Mitchell Sterling Williams (“Williams”) petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. I referred the petition to the magistrate for a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The magistrate’s R & R recommends that I deny the petition. Petitioner filed timely objections. I agree with the magistrate’s recommendation to deny the petition. I write separately, however, because I do not find untimeliness to bar Williams’s claims, find two of them procedurally…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Donald C. Burrell v. Eric ArmelDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API