Legal Opinion

Bayers v. Barry

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1921No. 16071PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Jurey, J., entered April 7,1920, upon the verdict of a jury, rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action upon a contract.

1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.

— The respondent, Bayers, during the year 1919 was, and for'many years prior thereto had been, a resident of Juneau, Alaska. Much of his time had been spent in the fishing industry. The appellants, Barry and Groll, were fish-cannery men, residing in the state of Washington. Prior to February, 1919, the respondent had made certain preparations for the building and operation of a fish cannery at Douglas, Alaska. He had made arrangements for the lease of a suitable wharf upon which the cannery might be built and operated, and he had a boat and large scow suitable for the fishing industry, and he…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Singer v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Yakima Valley Bank v. McAllisterWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. State v. BoyceWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Duggan v. Pacific Boom Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Bunck v. McAulayWashington Supreme Court · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Buyken v. ErtnerWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Vogel v. Alaska Steamship Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Bates v. TirkWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Bloomquist v. Buffelen Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Dehoney v. GjardeWashington Supreme Court · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API