Hill v. Port Authority Transit System
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Smith,
Appellant, Gail E Hill, appeals from the September 9, 1987 decision of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County denying Appellant’s motion for post-trial relief in the nature of a request for increase in a non-jury verdict of $20,938.38 at 18% interest rendered in Appellant’s behalf.
Appellant raises three issues for review: Whether the trial court erred as a matter of law in concluding that Appellant’s basic loss benefits recoverable against the Port Authority of Allegheny County (Authority) under the No-Fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act1 (No-Fault Act) were limited…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Allstate Insurance v. HeffnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Hayes v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Antanovich v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Antanovich v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gielarowski v. Port AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Hill v. Port Authority Transit SystemCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Gielarowski v. Port AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Hill v. PORT AUTH. T. SYS., ALLEG. CTY.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989