Legal Opinion

Hill v. Port Authority Transit System

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 11, 1989No. Appeal No. 2332 C.D. 1987PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Smith,

Appellant, Gail E Hill, appeals from the September 9, 1987 decision of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County denying Appellant’s motion for post-trial relief in the nature of a request for increase in a non-jury verdict of $20,938.38 at 18% interest rendered in Appellant’s behalf.

Appellant raises three issues for review: Whether the trial court erred as a matter of law in concluding that Appellant’s basic loss benefits recoverable against the Port Authority of Allegheny County (Authority) under the No-Fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act1 (No-Fault Act) were limited…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Allstate Insurance v. HeffnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Hayes v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Antanovich v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Antanovich v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gielarowski v. Port AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Hill v. Port Authority Transit SystemCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Gielarowski v. Port AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Hill v. PORT AUTH. T. SYS., ALLEG. CTY.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API