Legal Opinion
Fehir v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided May 20, 1988No. S-2314PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Justice.
Milan Fehir filed a petition for hearing before this court to review the court of appeals’ decision denying him a hearing to seek remission of his forfeited security interest in the fishing vessel, St. Roland. See Fehir v. State, 739 P.2d 785 (Alaska App.1987). We reverse. 1
In February 1985, Fehir loaned $45,000 to Ljudevit Blazevic to purchase the fishing vessel St. Roland. Blazevic pledged the St. Roland as security for the $45,000 loan. Fehir hired an attorney to draft a promissory note that documented the loan and the security agreement. Blazevic executed the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. RiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- State of New Jersey v. MoriarityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1967
- Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. One 1979 Pontiac Trans AmCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
- Waiste v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Baum v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2001