Legal Opinion

Baum v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided March 30, 2001No. A-7622PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, J.

This appeal presents two major issues of law dealing with the range of permissible punishments for big-game guiding offenses. First, when a person is convicted of a big-game guiding offense, does forfeiture of an airplane worth $40,000 violate the excessive fines clause of the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution? For the reasons explained here, we conclude that the answer is "no". Second, if the applicable sentencing statute gives the court the authority to suspend or revoke a defendant's hunting license for up to a maximum number of years, does the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Roman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. RiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Brown v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. AuliyeCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2002
  2. Edwards v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2001
  3. Allen v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2007
  4. Alvin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2002
  5. Allen v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API