Junkans v. Bergin
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Trinity County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
This action ivas brought to quiet title, and judgment was rendered for plaintiff. Defendant’s motion for a new .trial was denied, and he appealed from the judgment and order denying the motion.
*204The judgment roll in Whitmore & Reed v. Ah Hoe, et lT. was improperly admitted in evidence. The action was a joint one against all the defendants, Ah Hoe, Mon Kong, Ah Juan, Ah Sam, and Charlie Hop Lee. Ah Sam was never served with process, and the action was never dismissed as to him. The judgment was by default, and was entered by the clerk without any action of the court. The judgment was void. The…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Burtnett v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Baird v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Wharton v. HarlanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Trans-Pacific Trading Co. v. Patsy Frock & Romper Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Lacoste v. EastlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.