Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

All Time Mfg. Co. v. Van Steenburgh

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided September 6, 1961No. File No. CV 6-611-62MPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff has filed a motion to dismiss the defendant's appeal on the grounds that (1) the defendant has failed to file an assignment of errors within the time allowed, without an extension of time for filing having been requested or obtained by him, and (2) he has failed to prosecute his appeal with proper diligence.

On January 25, 1961, the defendant filed an appeal from a judgment rendered against him on January 12, 1961, after trial to the court. Upon the defendant's request, the court filed its finding of facts on March 7, 1961. On March 22, 1961, the fifteenth day after the filing of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Verzier v. ConvardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
  2. Budd v. Meriden Electric RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
  3. State Ex Rel. Baskin v. BartlettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  4. Miller v. CrossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
  5. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. IllySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Spicer Fuel Co. v. PadgettConnecticut Superior Court · 1962
  2. Page v. Welfare CommissionerConnecticut Superior Court · 1974
  3. Page v. Welfare CommissionerPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1974
  4. Spicer Fuel Co. v. PadgettConnecticut Appellate Court · 1962
  5. State v. AndrzyskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API