Legal Opinion

Maatta v. Kippola

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1894PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Houghton. (Hubbell, J.) Summary proceedings to recover the possession of land. Complainant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is a summary proceeding to recover possession of real estate. The facts were agreed to on the trial before a jury in the court below as follows:

For two years and upwards prior to December 21, 1891, the defendant was a tenant at will of the Hungarian Copper Company, and occupied the lands in question as such tenant at will, and at an annual rent of $100. During the time defendant so occupied said lands as tenant at will under the said Hungarian Copper Company, he, the defendant, built the house mentioned and described in the complaint, and from the time he so built said house he and his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pelan v. De BevardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
  2. Conklin v. FosterIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Johnson v. RichardsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1857
  4. Buckingham v. BuckinghamMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Panagopulos v. Manning Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Township of Jasper v. MartinMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Holliday v. MathewsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Allen v. CraneMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  5. John Wallace Sons Co. v. WilkinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API