Radley v. Radley

Emery, V. C.

To a bill for dower, the heirs-at-law set up by their answer the defence that complainant released her right of dower by a conveyance of the property, made by herself and her husband in his lifetime, to the defendant Acken. They also deny that complainant was the wife of Alfred N. Radley, the intestate, but this defence was not urged after the proof of marriage made at the hearing. As to the conveyance, the proofs disclosed the’ *249following facts bearing on the issues now involved: On November 18th, 1901, Alfred N. Radley and the complainant, Pauline K., his wife, as parties of the…