Legal Opinion

Moore v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 2, 1988No. 641, Docket 87-7793PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WINTER, Circuit Judge:

Defendant-appellee Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“Metropolitan”) maintains medical benefit plans for its employees under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461 (1982). These plans contain provisions unambiguously reserving Metropolitan’s right to amend or terminate them. Pursuant to that reservation of rights, Metropolitan has amended the plan numerous times, usually augmenting benefits, but sometimes diminishing them. This appeal presents the question of whether Metropolitan may be barred from altering benefits under the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Nachwalter v. ChristieCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  3. Musto v. American General Corp.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Moore v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API