Legal Opinion

Hess v. Kemmerer

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 18, 1916No. Appeal, No. 195PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal, No. 195, Oct. T., 1916, by defendant, from judgment of O. P. No. 4, Philadelphia Co., June T., 1915, No. 4795, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Theodore Hess v. Earle Kemmerer. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. Before Carr, J. At the trial the jury returned a verdict for $1,500 in favor of the plaintiff.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 195, Oct. T., 1916, by defendant, from judgment of O. P. No. 4, Philadelphia Co., June T., 1915, No. 4795, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Theodore Hess v. Earle Kemmerer. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. Before Carr, J. At the trial the jury returned a verdict for $1,500 in favor of the plaintiff. On a rule for judgment n. o. v. and for a new trial, Carr, J., filed the following opinion: The plaintiff was injured on May 6, 1915, at three o’clock in the afternoon while crossing Broad street at Melon, which is the first street south of Ridge avenue. The…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Orlady, P. J.,

The painstaking analysis of the testimony by the trial judge, and his application of decided cases to the undisputed facts in overruling the defendant’s motions for a new trial and for judgment non obstante veredicto, make it unnecessary to further review this case, and for the reasons given in his opinion, the judgment is affirmed.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Curt v. ZimanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Rose v. Quaker City Cab Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API