Legal Opinion

Curt v. Ziman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 5, 1940No. Appeal, 15PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

Plaintiff brought this action to recover for personal injuries sustained as a result of placing his hand against a circular saw in defendant’s ice-cutting machine. He obtained a verdict for |1500 but thereafter the lower court entered judgment n. o. v. for the defendant, upon the ground of absence of proof of defendant’s negligence and for the further reason that, even if defendant’s negligence be assumed, plaintiff had been guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.

In disposing of this appeal by the plaintiff from that judgment it is our duty to read the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ebbert v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Markman v. Fred P. Bell Stores Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Durning v. HymanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Vetter v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Murphy v. Bernheim & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McCreery v. Westmoreland Farm Bureau Co-Operative Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Spearing v. StarcherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. New England Pretzel Co. v. PalmerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1949
  4. Debenjak v. Parkway Oil Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Jose A. Rodriguez v. Brunswick CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API