Legal Opinion

The Czechoslovakia Victory

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 30, 1948PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIFKIND, District Judge.

By notice of motion and affidavit libel-lant moves for an order striking out that portion of respondents’ answer which denies jurisdiction in the admiralty with respect to the second cause of action alleged in the libel.

The normal procedure in the admiralty is to raise such an issue by exception and, in some circumstances, by exceptive allegations. However, no objection has been taken to the borrowed procedure and I shall treat the motion as an exception and the affidavit as an exceptive allegation.

The exception poses this question: Whether the admiralty has…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. The AdaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  2. Aktieselsikabet Fido v. Lloyd BrazilieroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  3. Evans v. New York & P. S. S. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1906
  4. Luckenbach S. S. Co. v. Gano Moore Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1923
  5. The GoyazDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. David Crystal, Inc. v. Cunard Steam-Ship CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
  2. Marubeni-Iida (America), Inc. v. Nippon Yusen KaishaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  3. Howmet Corporation v. Tokyo Shipping Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1971
  4. Van Camp Sea Food Co. v. Pacific-Atlantic S. S. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Interior Warehouse Co. v. The Capetan YemelosDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API