Castle v. BH YATES COMPANY, INC.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BROCK, Judge.
Plaintiff assigns as error the trial court’s refusal of his motion to be permitted to reopen his case in order to offer additional evidence. Plaintiff proposed to recall B. H. Yates, president of defendant company, for the purpose of inquiring into the amount of commissions defendant company had received on certain orders taken by plaintiff. This motion was made at the close of all the evidence. The court denied this motion after noting that Mr. Yates was present in court and capable of walking to the witness stand.
The trial court, in its discretion, may allow plaintiff or…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Rose & Day, Inc. v. ClearyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
3Cited by8 opinions
- Tanglewood Land Co., Inc. v. WoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Donavant v. HudspethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Harris v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Gay v. WalterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Reid v. MidgettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.