Rose & Day, Inc. v. Cleary
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
Defendant assigns as error the denial of his motion for a trial by jury. In his brief defendant admits that he did not demand a jury trial as provided by Rule 38 of the Rules of Civil Procedure and that his motion for trial by jury was based on Rule 39(b). Rule 39(b) provides as follows: “Issues not demanded for trial by jury as provided in Rule 38 shall be tried by the court; but, notwithstanding the failure of a party to demand a trial by jury in an action in which such a demand might have been made of right, the court in its discretion upon motion or of its own initiative may…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. . SatterfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Rural Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Hope Dale Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Featherston v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Williams v. . AverittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1824
- Kelly v. . GoodbreadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1816
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Castle v. BH YATES COMPANY, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- Maness v. BullinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. AustinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. AustinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974