Legal Opinion
Logan v. Sectek, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided July 8, 2009No. 3:08-cr-00209PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION GRANTING DEFENDANTS C & D’S AND WOODWARD’S MOTIONS TO DISMISS [Docs. # 27, 28]
VANESSA L. BRYANT, District Judge.
The defendants C & D Security Management, Inc. (“C & D”), and Lance Woodward move pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) to dismiss the counts directed against them in the amended complaint filed by the plaintiff, John Logan. The named defendant, SecTek, Inc. (“SecTek”), is not a party to the instant motions. C & D and Woodward argue that Logan’s amended complaint fails to state claims upon which relief can be granted. For the reasons given below, C & D’s and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Brady v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Steven Weissman, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Dawn Joy Fashions,inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Kinney v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Martinez v. CONNECTICUT, STATE LIBRARYDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2011
- Wanamaker v. Westport Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
- Yorzinski v. ImbertDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Conway v. Healthfirst Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- DrePaul v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.