Legal Opinion

(PS) Clewies v. AT&T

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 14, 2023No. 2:23-cv-00834Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DARRYL G. CLEWIES, No. 2:23–cv–834–DAD–KJN PS 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATINOS TO DISMISS 13 v. (ECF Nos. 1, 2, 4.) 14 AT&T INC., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, proceeding without counsel in this action, previously requested leave to amend 18 without prepayment of the filing fee (“IFP”).1 (ECF No. 2.) See

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(authorizing 19 the commencement of an action “without prepayment of fees or security” by a person who is 20 unable to pay such fees). This request was granted, but the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API