Scott v. Edwards Transportation Co.
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRobertson, Judge
I concur in Part I of the majority opinion. However, I believe that Section 287.030.1, RSMo 1986, and Crall v. Hickman, 460 S.W.2d 668 (Mo. banc 1970), require a reversal of the award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission as to appellant Medwick Johnston and a remand for reconsideration in light of Crall. I, therefore, respectfully dissent from Part II of the majority opinion.
Crall decided that “a partnership is a separate employing entity under sec. 287.-030.” Id. at 672. Crall reaches this conclusion fully aware of and contrary to general partnership law in Missouri which follows…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gladys Child Soars v. Soars-Lovelace, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1940
- Brollier v. Van AlstineMissouri Court of Appeals · 1942
- Blew v. ConnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Humphries v. BrayCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
- Ward v. State Farmers Mutual Tornado Insurance Co. of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.