Legal Opinion

United States v. Bridget C. Jones

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 25, 1991No. 90-1364PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KANNE, Circuit Judge.

A “loan procurement program” promoted to desperate or gullible persons generated over $11 million in procurement fees for Bridget and Richard Jones. No loans were ever procured and no taxes were ever paid on the fees received. Mrs. Jones was convicted of wire fraud, obstruction of justice and conspiracy. After failing to appear for sentencing, Mrs. Jones was apprehended and received a twenty-five year prison term. She appeals her convictions and sentence, raising a variety of arguments, and we affirm.

I

Bridget C. Jones and her late husband, Richard L. Jones, operated what…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Peretz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. United States v. Glenn WellmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. Thomas S. Ross and John ColloriCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  2. People v. BurtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  3. United States v. Erina S. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Norby WaltersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Bridget C. Jones and Johonnas J. EickeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API