Legal Opinion
United States v. Bridget C. Jones and Johonnas J. Eicke
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 20, 1993No. 91-2162, 91-2163PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHADUR, Senior District Judge.
Bridget C. Jones (“Jones”) 1 and Johon-nas J. Eicke (“Eicke”), who were convicted of bond-jumping-related offenses in a jury trial in the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois, 2 present con solidated appeals from sentences imposed on them under the United States Sentencing Guidelines (“Guidelines”). They argue principally (but not solely) that the district court erred by adjusting their sentences-upward for obstructing justice by committing perjury.
En route to the resolution of their appeals we are also called on to address, at…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Wade v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. GraysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wisconsin Knife Works v. National Metal CraftersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Alan Masters, Michael J. Corbitt, and James D. KeatingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- United States v. Michael MustreadCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Robert M. LevineCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Lynell R. EwingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Ramon Vargas, United States of America v. Raul ChaidezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Frederick R. Draves, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.