Legal Opinion

Heyman v. Crocheron

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 9, 1922No. 8374Published

1Opinion of the Court

*803HENRY L. HEYMAN VS H. CROCHERON

No. 8374

By Charlea í1. Claiborne, JudgB, with ooncurrenoe cf Judge»* at'. Paul and Dinkelapiel.

The defendant is a member of the Fire Department of the City of New^Orl^M^ Plaintiff having garnisheed hi a salary, he pleads that they aro exempt from seizure, both as a "publie officer" and as a "laborer".

I. Admitting that a fireman's wages are "money due for the salary of an officer" under Act 79 of 1876 p 123, or under Article 1992 (1987) of the Civil Code, or "salaries of office" under Article 647 of the Code of Practice, they are liable to seizure. Among the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. CollinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  2. Lesley v. KiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  3. Neafie's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  4. State ex rel. Broussard v. HendersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
  5. Succession of DupreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API