Heyman v. Crocheron
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*803HENRY L. HEYMAN VS H. CROCHERON
No. 8374
By Charlea í1. Claiborne, JudgB, with ooncurrenoe cf Judge»* at'. Paul and Dinkelapiel.
The defendant is a member of the Fire Department of the City of New^Orl^M^ Plaintiff having garnisheed hi a salary, he pleads that they aro exempt from seizure, both as a "publie officer" and as a "laborer".
I. Admitting that a fireman's wages are "money due for the salary of an officer" under Act 79 of 1876 p 123, or under Article 1992 (1987) of the Civil Code, or "salaries of office" under Article 647 of the Code of Practice, they are liable to seizure. Among the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Schroeder v. CollinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
- Lesley v. KiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Neafie's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- State ex rel. Broussard v. HendersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
- Succession of DupreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.