Tarrance v. Montgomery County Bd. of Educ.
District Court, M.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DE MENT, District Judge.
Before the court is Defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment, which was filed July 18, 2001. Plaintiff filed a Response August 7, and Defendant issued a Reply August 13. After careful consideration of the arguments of counsel, the relevant law, and the record as a whole, the court finds that the motion is due to be granted.
I. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
The court exercises, subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (federal question jurisdic tion). The parties do not contest personal jurisdiction or venue.
II.SUMMARY…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Richardson v. JacksonDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2008
- Amaya v. VilsackDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2024