Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1976No. Docket 57761Published

1Opinion of the Court

397 Mich. 481 (1976)

245 N.W.2d 9

LEWIS

v.

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

Docket No. 57761.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided August 26, 1976.

Rubenstein, Pruchnicki & Chittle for defendant.

2Per curiam

Defendant's application for leave to appeal asks that we resolve a conflict between panels of the Court of Appeals on the meaning of "total and irrecoverable loss of sight of one eye"[1] in an insurance contract. In Sump v St Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co, 21 Mich App 160; 175 NW2d 44 (1970), Sidney Sump suffered a reduction in vision in the left eye, correctable to 20/200. The Court of Appeals refused to…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rizzo v. KretschmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Zurich Insurance Co. v. RomboughMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Sump v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Lewis v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Lewis v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API