Rietz v. Hovden Food Prodducts Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
P1aintiff recovered judgment against def en. dant for the alleged purchase price of two presses. Defendant appeals from said judgment.
Defendant presents numerous contentions on this appeal hut the determinative question under the unusual situation presented by the record is whether there was any valid written contract between the plaintiff and defendant for the purchase of said presses.
Plaintiff was engaged in the manufacture and sale of machinery under the fictitious name of Process Machinery Company. Defendant was a corporation engaged in fish canning at Monterey. The president of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Illinois Fuel Co. v. Mobile & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
- Ellison v. Jackson Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
- American Paper-Bag Co. v. Van NortwickCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1892
- Anglo-California Trust Co. v. WallaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Parrino v. RallisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Blyther v. Pentagon Federal Credit UnionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962
- Garthofner v. EdmondsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946