Akers v. Decatur Street Bank
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Complaint; from city court of Atlanta — Judge H. M. Reid. April 14, 1914.
1Opinion of the CourtBeotles, J.
1. The title of the holder of a note can not be inquired into, unless it is necessary for the protection of the defendant, or to let in defenses which he seeks to make. Civil Code, § 4290. The defendant in this case, in his answer to the suit on the promissory notes, denied generally the indebtedness alleged in the petition; and, nowhere having set up a legal defense, his denial was in effect a plea of the general issue, and was properly stricken on demurrer. Johnson v. Cobb, 100 Ga. 139 (28 S. E. 72).
2. Section 5034 of the Civil Code provides that “In all eases where' the defendant desires…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Johnson v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
3Cited by6 opinions
- Richey v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- SOUTHERN GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. BeasleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Wardlaw v. Chattanooga Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Howard v. Jones Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Norton v. National Commercial Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.