Legal Opinion

Howard v. Jones Motor Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 26, 1961No. 39096PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eberhakdt, Judge.

If the petition had not sought the recovery of attorney’s fees the answer in the nature of a general denial would have presented no issuable defense, and a demurrer or motion to strike would have been good. Johnson v. Cobb, 100 Ga. 139, 141 (28 SE 72); Thomas & McCafferty v. Siesel, 2 Ga. App. 663 (58 SE 1131); McMillan v. Fourth Nat. Bank, 19 Ga. App. 445 (89 SE 635); Akers v. Decatur Street Bank, 16 Ga. App. 262 (85 SE 201); Richey v. Johnson, 21 Ga. App. 41 (93 SE 514); Bowden v. Davison-Paxon Co., 71 Ga. App. 379, 382 (31 SE2d 83).

However, since there was a prayer for the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Johnson v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Charles v. Valdosta Foundry & Machine Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  3. Davis v. Muscogee Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  4. Thomas & McCafferty v. SieselCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  5. Bass v. African Methodist Episcopal ChurchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Spielberg v. McEntireCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. Palmer Tire Co. v. L. & H. Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API