Howard v. Jones Motor Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Eberhakdt, Judge.
If the petition had not sought the recovery of attorney’s fees the answer in the nature of a general denial would have presented no issuable defense, and a demurrer or motion to strike would have been good. Johnson v. Cobb, 100 Ga. 139, 141 (28 SE 72); Thomas & McCafferty v. Siesel, 2 Ga. App. 663 (58 SE 1131); McMillan v. Fourth Nat. Bank, 19 Ga. App. 445 (89 SE 635); Akers v. Decatur Street Bank, 16 Ga. App. 262 (85 SE 201); Richey v. Johnson, 21 Ga. App. 41 (93 SE 514); Bowden v. Davison-Paxon Co., 71 Ga. App. 379, 382 (31 SE2d 83).
However, since there was a prayer for the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Johnson v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Charles v. Valdosta Foundry & Machine Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Davis v. Muscogee Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Thomas & McCafferty v. SieselCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Bass v. African Methodist Episcopal ChurchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Spielberg v. McEntireCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Palmer Tire Co. v. L. & H. Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966