Legal Opinion

Lott v. Scottsdale Insurance Company

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided September 14, 2011No. Case 1:11CV362PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

T.S. ELLIS, III, District Judge.

This insurance coverage dispute is unusual in the array of parties involved; it includes not only the typical alleged tortfeasor and its insurer — the principals in this coverage dispute — but also the tort claimants, a second alleged tortfeasor, and the second tortfeasor’s insurer. The second tortfeasor’s insurer has acknowledged that it has a duty to defend and indemnify its own insured, but the first tortfeasor’s insurer has denied that it owes either duty to its insured. At issue is whether the tort claimants, the second tortfeasor, and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lott v. Scottsdale InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
  2. CE Design Ltd. v. American Economy InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
  3. Motsinger v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2013
  4. American National Property and Casualty Company v. Select Management Group, L.L.C.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2021
  5. Church Mutual Insurance Company v. Lake Pointe Assisted Living, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API