Legal Opinion

Bridgman v. Johnson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1880PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Berrien. Assumpsit. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Bridgman and Bacon were sued as successive endorsers of a note made by Anderson Russell and Henderson Russell, in December, 1873, payable to Bridgman or order with interest at ten per cent, three years frona date. This was one of three notes payable at different times and secured by mortgage. Bridgman transferred them all with the mortgage to Bacon, endorsing the notes, and Bacon endorsed and transferred them to Mrs. Clark.

In August, 1875, the mortgage was foreclosed on the first note by advertisement and the property bid in by Mrs. Clark. She subsequently conveyed the premises by warranty…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCurdy v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Miles v. SkinnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rose v. PageMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API