Legal Opinion

Soloski v. Adams

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided March 2, 2009No. 1:06-cv-03043PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MARVIN H. SHOOB, Senior District Judge.

The matter before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report & Recommendation (R & R) and plaintiffs and defendants’ objections to the R & R.

Background

The Court adopts the following undisputed facts as stated in the R & R:

This case arises out of allegations that Plaintiff made comments to a female subordinate that she considered to constitute sexual harassment. While Plaintiff acknowledges having made the alleged comments, he contends that they did not violate the University’s Nondiscrimination and Anti-Harassment (NDAH) Policy and that he should…

2Cases cited123 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Locascio v. BBDO Atlanta, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2014
  2. Smith v. PefanisDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2009
  3. Brown v. CSX Transportation Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2016
  4. Fields v. Atlanta Independent School SystemDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2013
  5. Davis v. Legal Services Alabama, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API