Legal Opinion

Venable v. EnLink Midstream Operating, LP

District Court, M.D. Louisiana

Decided February 20, 2020No. 3:18-cv-00847Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA TODD VENABLE CIVIL ACTION VERSUS 18-847-SDD-RLB ENLINK MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP RULING This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment1 by Defendant, EnLink Midstream Operating, LP (“Defendant” or “EnLink”). Plaintiff, Todd Venable (“Plaintiff”) has filed an Opposition2 to this motion, to which Defendant filed a Reply.3 For the following reasons, the Court finds that Defendant’s motion should be granted in part and denied in part. I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND4 EnLink contends Plaintiff’s employment began with EnLink around…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API